When couples get married, each brings aspects of their single lives into the marriage, including previously-acquired property. Solely-owned assets do not necessarily directly benefit the marriage, but they can become a point of contention when property is divided in divorce. Unless the couples privately agree otherwise, each spouse will walk away with a share of the marital estate, so both are left with access to financial resources to rebuild their lives as single persons. Further, equity or fairness dictates that one spouse should not be able to reap all the rewards of a marriage when both contributed to the acquisition and appreciation of marital property. This concept is referred to as equitable distribution in Florida law, which says that an equal division of marital property is the presumed arrangement in divorce unless other factors indicate a different outcome is necessary to avoid an unjust result. However, property brought into the marriage is typically not subject to division, unless its value was enhanced by marital funds or the efforts of the non-owner spouse. The exclusion of separate property is not absolute, and becomes much more complicated when assessing the rights of a non-owning spouse to a share in the passive appreciation of a home owned solely by one spouse, but used as the primary residence by the married couple. The Florida Supreme Court issued a decision on the distribution of passive appreciation of this type of non-marital property in 2011, and a discussion of how this issue is evaluated by courts will be explored below.
When Passive Appreciation Becomes a Marital Asset
The home a married couple resides in is often the most valuable asset either owns, and in some marriages, the home predates the relationship and is titled solely in the name of one spouse. Under the rules of equitable distribution of marital property, this home would not be considered a marital asset because it was purchased with non-marital funds. However, it is not uncommon for a spouse to pay the mortgage on such homes with marital funds. In this situation, while the home itself cannot be divided, a portion of the home’s passive appreciation that accumulates during the time of the marriage could be. This distribution is permitted because marital funds enhanced the value of the asset, and thus the value added would be considered a marital asset. Note that the enhancement of the home does not have to be strictly monetary to create an interest for non-owning spouse, but some contribution that enhanced the value must be established.
Before a court can determine that passive appreciation of a home owned separately by one spouse is subject to division and the correct allocation, the judge must engage in a fact-driven analysis of the circumstances surrounding the satisfaction of the mortgage payments and other financial obligations related to the home. This evaluation requires the court to make the following assessments:
The allocation of passive appreciation will depend on the value of the home at the time of the marriage and the percentage of the home’s purchase price that was financed. The greater the amount financed, which translates into a greater percentage of the marital funds that will be used to pay off the obligation, the more a non-owning spouse can claim as his/her rightful share.
Contact an Orlando Divorce Lawyer
Getting the correct allocation of marital assets is a pivotal issue in divorce, especially if there is concern about the status of property owned prior to the marriage. The Orlando law firm Donna Hung Law Group has years of experience guiding individuals through divorce, and knows how to analyze and break down the property settlement that is appropriate in a particular case. Contact the law firm at (407) 999-0099 to schedule a confidential consultation.
“Donna Hung and her team are professional, responsive, and compassionate. They behave like leaders in the industry. And I can see why they are so highly valued and sought after from previous reviewers. I had an excellent experience with her and her team, and although I’d highly Hope not to use them again personally, ;-) I would highly recommend her and her team to others that are going through a divorce. Thank you guys!!” — Justin
“Donna Hung and her entire team could not have taken better care of me through my divorce. You will not find a better firm to represent you and your interests in Orlando. I could not be more grateful that I chose Donna to represent me during one of the toughest times in my life. I highly recommend Donna and her team!! You will not be disappointed.” — Peter
“I am extremely pleased with the representation, counsel, and service I received from Donna Hung and her staff. She and her team are the ultimate professionals. Throughout the process, Donna and her team consistently kept me informed of the status of my case.” — Monica
“Donna did exactly what I hoped for. My divorce process had lots of potential to become very messy but incredibly she was able to help me set up a fair proposal for an uncontested divorce. She was compassionate and caring and with a lot of patience we were able to obtain what we wanted.” — TQ
“During a very difficult time, Donna was patient and communicated all possible options. She listened to me and helped through a very challenging situation. She really cared about helping me get my life back.” — Stephanie
“In my latest shared custody case, which spanned over a year, Miss Hung and her team never once relented on the task of getting a positive outcome. This is the ONLY office you need for your family law case! Thank you!” — Jeremy
“I was referred to Attorney Hung by a colleague and found her to be an invaluable member of my professional team. Attorney Hung has a perfect demeanor for legal counsel and representation: she is even-keeled and empathetic, while also assertive, skillful and downright sharp. She provided me . ” — Kelly
“Donna Hung was kind, caring and professional from the consultation all the way up to the pretrial conference. She saw my case, learned what she needed to know about me and fought for me with the utmost confidence all while doing her best to help me to stay calm and collective.” — T.D.
“Donna Hung and her entire team could not have taken better care of me through my divorce. You will not find a better firm to represent you and your interests in Orlando. I could not be more grateful that I chose Donna to represent me during one of the toughest times in my life. I highly recommend Donna and her team!! You will not be disappointed.” — Peter
“Donna is absolutely amazing! My divorce became very messy and she handled it and my ex-husband’s lawyer like a pro! They would forget to submit things and even canceled the hearing without telling us but she stuck with me at the courthouse” — Alex
“My experience with Donna Hung was excellent. She is highly competent and outstanding in her work. I am pleased to know that Lawyers of her Caliber exist in our community.” — William
“After talking to several different divorce attorneys and family lawyers I turned to Donna Hung and her staff; I knew that I had found the divorce attorney for me. Donna Hung made me feel confident that my divorce would be handled in a proficient and professional manner.” — Jonathan
Day Building
605 E Robinson St, Ste 730
Orlando, FL 32801
(By Appointment Only)
The Donna Hung Law Group serves people in Orlando and throughout Central Florida, including those in Lake Mary, Lake Nona, Kissimmee, Windermere, Winter Garden, Bay Hill, Altamonte Springs, Longwood, Sanford, Oviedo, Maitland, Casselberry, Fern Park, Winter Park, and all cities within Orange, Osceola and Seminole County. We can also travel to counties outside of Central Florida such as Lake, Volusia, Brevard, and Polk County.
No content on this site may be reused in any fashion without written permission from www.donnahunglaw.com